For heterosexual men, there was an effect of human-stimuli category on TFF, F(3, 184) = , p
001, R 2 = 0.33. They were slower to fixate on individuals with penises than on cisgender women, b = 0.04, 95% CI (0.02, 0.05), SE = 0.01, p
The new count on times to own heterosexual men’s room TFFs towards the cisgender women, women trans people with boobs, and you may female trans some body instead boobs overlapped much more, appearing that feminine photographs tended to grab the very early notice
For gay men, there was an effect of human-stimuli category on TFF, F(3, 68) = 5.70, p = 0.002, R 2 = 0.20. Gay men were quicker to fixate on individuals with penises than on cisgender women, b = ? 0.04, 95% CI (? 0.07, ? 0.02), SE = 0.01, p = 0.002. There was suggestive evidence that gay men were slower to fixate on feminine trans individuals than on cisgender men, b = 0.04, 95% CI (
There was an effect of stimuli category (including control images) on TFF for heterosexual men, F(4, 230) = , p
Total obsession years
For heterosexual men, there was an effect of human-stimuli category on TFD, F(3, 184) = , p
For gay men, there was an effect of human-stimuli category on TFD, F(3, 68) = , p
There was an effect of stimuli category (including control images) on TFD for heterosexual men, F(4, 230) = , p
For heterosexual men, there was an effect of human-stimuli category on TFF, F(3, 184) = , p < 0 001, R 2 = 0.33. They were slower to fixate on individuals with penises than on cisgender women, b = 0.04, 95% CI (0.02, 0.05), SE = 0.01, p < 0.001. However, they were quicker to […]
Bővebben
